![]() ![]() In 2016, Google was once again found to be in the right, which was the last major development until this most recent decision. Google successfully argued its claims in 2012, but the decision was reversed in 2014 after an appeal by Oracle. Through Android Studio, it is easy to get a native look/feel for Java apps, but when it comes to desktops, the UI is far from acceptable (does not. Poor UI appearance on all of the major GUI libraries (Swing, SWT, etc.). The Tuesday finding marks the third trial in this case, which has seen victories on both sides. Due to the all of the abstraction of the JVM, Java SE programs take much more resources to compile and run compared to Python. ![]() Oracle's case rests on the idea that Google unlawfully copied Oracle's Java APIs for use in Android, when, rather than license the Java platform from Sun Microsystems (acquired by Oracle), Google wrote its own version through reverse engineering. Google's argument is that Java is open-source, and that its use of the APIs structure, sequence, and organization fell under fair use. Download the Java including the latest version 17 LTS on the Java SE Platform. ![]() Of course, considering Google's revenues last quarter were just over $32 billion, the company's certainly good for it - but losing several billion dollars is never ideal. Winning the case is mostly important for Google from a precedent-setting standpoint, but losing would also carry a hefty charge in the last trial Oracle claimed damages of almost $9 billion. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |